Showing posts with label competition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label competition. Show all posts

Friday, February 15, 2013

Rule #25 Live like a student as long as you can.

"The essentials of life are cheap. Only the luxuries are expensive." - Ron Muhlenkamp

Remember when you were a student at college or university? Remember how much fun it was and yet how broke you were? You didn't have a luxurious place to live in, or a car, and you walked to everything, or maybe skateboarded everywhere?  The TV you had was the TV the previous tenants left behind because it was too bloody heavy to move... you know.. the Radiation King with the wooden case, and you certainly couldn't afford cable TV.  You stayed in and hung out with friends, choosing potlucks instead of going to fancy restaurants.  You made coffee at home, and brought sandwiches for lunch instead of buying it.  Cheap Poutine and Pitcher of Beer night at the local pub was the best night of the week because you and your friends could nurse your drink and wax poetic all night long at discount prices.  Life was simple.  You had few financial liabilities and it was fun living this way.



But then something happened.  There was this temptation that with a new career must also come a car, new furniture, fancy clothes, an expensive watch or phone, a big flat-screen TV,  and instead of frequenting the local watering hole, you feel compelled to hang out in the more expensive places with the foreign or micro-brews on tap instead of the cheap domestics.   Your big adult paycheque deserved a big adult lifestyle.   That big TV meant a cable-TV plan, and high-speed internet and a phone with a big data-plan.  Whoa! This is starting to sound expensive.

I always tell young people I meet to resist this temptation as much as possible, for as long as possible.  It is extremely difficult to save, pay down debt, and generally get ahead if you jump into a higher standard of living without the financial base to make it happen first, and that is just what many recent grads do.  Once people get used to a high-status high-consumption lifestyle, it is often very difficult for people to reign in that spending if needed, so the longer you can prolong your student lifestyle, the better.  I can not emphasize enough how much financial sacrifice plays in to financial well-being and resisting many of these adult lifestyle trappings can be a boon to your bottom line and mental well-being.  In my opinion, spending money on luxuries in life such as cars, expensive clothes, and expensive monthly liabilities such as Cable-TV should only be done once the basics are covered such as eliminating bad debt and having some savings.  Another thing I've noticed is that people with high standards of lifestyle without a financial base often worry a lot about maintaining that lifestyle...  and I generally like to sleep at night, so a simple carefree lifestyle suits me just fine.

When I was in grad school, we lived just like in the first paragraph.  My wife and I lived in a very modest apartment, we didn't own a car, and we didn't have have a TV let alone cable TV.   When I got my first employment position as a technical professional, there was a temptation to buy all the fancy things people come to expect with such a position.  But we resisted.  We did however buy a house after  I had been working for 3 months only because we were going to be evicted from our apartment due to a coming renovation.  While we did own a house, it would be another 4 years before we would buy a car.  It wasn't that we couldn't arrange for a car-loan to get one, it was that cars are money pits, and we weren't interested in digging new financial holes while we were trying to pay off our student loans.

With two adult salaries, but without many of the liabilities many adults take on, we were able to slay both our student loans ($58 thousand worth) in just over 3 years, save up enough to pay for a used car four years after I started working, begin to max out our RRSPs, and give to worthwhile charities.  We were essentially saving 50% of our take home pay.... By comparison to many in our field and experience level, our standard of living was modest, but we were very happy because we maintained that interactive social face-to-face lifestyle by continuing pot-luck get-togethers and Cheap Beer and Poutine nights.  We still lived with "student" quality furniture because it still met our needs.  It was still functional, though certainly not fashionable.  We only bought stuff out of necessity, not because of some feeling or self-imposed obligation around keeping up with others.    We never focused on what status items we were missing out on, but rather focused on relationships and building a solid financial base to give us more flexibility and freedom as we got older.  Once the essentials of living have been taken care of, then we focus on adding the luxuries.

At our current stage in life, which is late-thirties with young kids, we have adopted many of the liabilities that come with adulthood: A nice car, high-speed internet, club memberships etc, but we only added these lifestyle choices when we could afford them.  To this day we still walk or bike everywhere we can, we do not have Cable-TV, dont frequent fancy restaurants more than once a year, and Cheap Beer and Poutine are still our favourite nights out.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Rule #15 Don't try to "Beat the Market"

Do you know the only thing that gives me pleasure? 
It's to see my dividends coming in. -John D. Rockerfeller

Have you ever heard anyone talk about beating the stock market?  Its what hotshot investors talk about at cocktail parties.  What they mean is that if the stock market has an annual return of 10% in one year, they have had a better return than that 10%.  Very impressive indeed!  They will try to achieve this by building and adjusting a stock portfolio, mutual fund portfolio, or with index funds.  Beating the market is all well and good if the market goes up, but what if the market goes down? If the market has a loss of 5% the next year and the investor only lost 3%, then they have also beaten the market because they have done better than the market has done that year.... but people don't tend to brag about losing money "Yeah! I only lost 3% this year!".  The market (and by market I mean Dow Jones Index, S&P 500 index, or TSX index etc...) has historically returned 8-12% returns annually but those numbers are smoothed out over decades of data, so you certainly couldn't count on a 10% return every single year... as has been the case the last decade.  One thing about measuring returns in the market this way is you only realize these returns when you sell the investment... and that brings on the issue of timing, and few people have mastered that.

I don't really care if I beat the market or not.  Beating the market is not my objective.  I am not in competition with the market, My objective is to build a portfolio that will eventually result in me being financially independent.  Who cares if you beat the market if the market has lousy or negative returns?  If the market loses 25% in a year, I feel no pride in only losing 20% that year.  And if the market were to make 25% in one year, its ridiculous for me to worry that I only returned 22% instead.  I feel this "beat the market" mentality is a waste and makes people take their eyes off the prize, or chase capital returns instead of stable cashflow.  People shop around for stocks or sectors hoping to get a winning year or to follow advisors or mutual funds because they have a few good yearly returns.  That just seems dumb to me.  I prefer a system that provides stable and somewhat more predictable results.

We have our own metrics.  We don't compete with the market, and we sure as hell dont try to beat it.  Our goal is to grow our cash-flow on existing assets by 8% a year... We get this by reinvesting the 3-5%-ish dividends that we get in cash-flow and then plan on a 4+% increase in dividends annually.  We generally don't pay much attention to stock prices once we own the stock because they tend to fluctuate due to world and political events rather than be based on actual company financial metrics.  Tracking growth of cashflow is pretty easy to understand and we don't have to follow the stock prices or compare with how the market is doing.  In fact, since we are reinvesting dividends to buy more stocks for cash-flow, we don't mind when the market takes a dive because it means we can pick up good stocks with even higher yields than before.



Every year for the last 10 years, our cashflow from existing assets has increased.  Every year! And Every year it has gone up above the rate of inflation.  The lowest growth rate was about 5% in 2009 and the highest has been about 15%.  Thats a pretty good record if you ask me.  This year is turning out to be a good one, we expect about a 10% increase in total this year if we keep going the way we're going.  Three quarters of our dividend producing stocks have increased their dividends this year and the rest probably will within the next 3-6 months, and we just keep rolling those dividends back into the portfolio buying more cash-flow-producing stocks, furthering the compounding.  This increase also does not include any new monies that we put to work in this strategy.  Include the new monies, and our conservative leveraging strategy and we're increasing our cashflow above our 8% per year target relatively easily.  Do I care how this all compares to what the stock market performance is doing these days?  No, I don't.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Rule #10 Thumb your nose at the Joneses


One book that has influenced me a lot, with respect to finances, is  The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas Stanley and William Danko. In it the authors discuss how American Millionaires accumulate their wealth, how they handle their money, what neighbourhoods they live in, what cars they drive, what beer they drink and so on....  Its a bit dry and it states and restates the same basic themes over and over, but it has loads of useful data and anecdotes that show the true self-made-millionaire way of living.  I have it on audiobook so I listen to it on my iPod when I'm out for a walk or a skate.  Yeah, I'm just that cool, longboarding down the street listening to self-help tapes.

Anyways... a significant amount of the book focusses on lifestyle choice, and how "Keeping up with the Joneses" makes it very difficult to accumulate wealth.  There are those that live like millionaires, to impress friends or colleagues, who cant afford it (The Jones keeper-uppers), and then there are those who really are millionaires.... and they dont get that way by buying a new iPhone every time Apple makes an upgrade.  They get that way be being frugal and not buying crap to impress other people.  The book shatters all the typical stereotypes that the wealthy drive expensive cars, live in big swanky houses, and drink expensive champagne.   All these perceptions are typically not true for the truly wealthy... People who do live like that typically have lousy balance sheets.


Impressing other people seems like one of the stupidest reasons to buy or upgrade things that are fully functional or still modern.  I know a couple that bought a really big $1000 barbecue when they had a 4 year old fully functional one already.  The catalyst for that purchase was that their neighbour backing on to their yard had just bought a fancy barbecue himself, and our friend just couldn't live with the barbecue they already had once he saw his neighbours... He was being outdone.   So now they have a shiny fancy new barbecue, yet all they do is grill meat with it... well, their old barbecue already did that and it was in fine shape.  So there is $1000 spent on a needless item.  I wouldn't tell them how to spend their money - the earned it, they can do whatever they want with it - but for us, impressing others is very low on what motivates us to buy anything.

A rule-of-thumb that we live by is that we don't compete with friends of family on things we own.  We dress, drive and live in what's comfortable or what our profession dictates is a minimum - that's it.  Why drink expensive wine, when beer is what we like to drink?  Have we been financially successful? We've done okay.  But we don't flaunt it and we don't try and meet a standard of a particular social class... that's just not our scene.  This "not looking the part" is one of the best ways to save money.  In general, a consumption-based, status-driven lifestyle makes it very difficult to accumulate assets , no matter what your paycheque is.